Neil Postman

Neil Postman

Ernst Cassirer on mediation of the human experience through symbol

Yet there is no remedy against this reversal of the natural order. Man cannot escape from his own achievement. He cannot but adopt the conditions of his own life. No longer in a merely physical universe, man lives in a symbolic universe. Language, myth, art, and religion are parts of this universe. They are the varied threads which weave the symbolic net, the tangled web of human experience. All human progress in thought and experience refines upon and strengthens this net. No longer can man confront reality immediately; he cannot see it, as it were, face to face. Physical reality seems to recede in proportion as man’s symbolic activity advances. Instead of dealing with the things themselves man is in a sense constantly conversing with himself. He has so enveloped himself in linguistic forms, in artistic images, in mythical symbols or religious rites that he cannot see or know anything except by the interposition of this artificial medium. His situation is the same in the theoretical as in the practical sphere. Even here man does not live in a world of hard facts, or according to his immediate needs and desires. He lives rather in the midst of imaginary emotions, in hopes and fears, in illusions and disillusions, in his fantasies and dreams. »What disturbs and alarms man,« said Epictetus, »are not the things, but his opinions and fancies about the things.«[3]
Ernst Cassirer in An Essay on Man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture, edited by Maureen Lukay, (Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2006), p. 30. First published (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1944). Cited in part by Neil Postman in Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public discourse in the age of show business, (New York: Penguin Books, 2006), p. 10.

Google Book Viewer


"Yet there is no remedy against this reversal of the natural order."

Footnotes

[3] [Epictetus, The Encheiridion, or Manual (No. 5), in: The Discourses, as reported by Arrian, the Manual, and Fragments, with an Engl. transl. by William Abbot Oldfather, 2 Bde., London/Cambridge, Mass. 1928, Bd. II, S. 479-537: S. 87: »It is not the things themselves that disturb men, but their judgements about these things.«]

Neil Postman on the values of spoken and written expression

Judges, lawyers and defendants do not regard proverbs or sayings as a relevant response to legal disputes. In this, they are separated from the tribal chief by a media-metaphor. For in a print-based courtroom, where law books, briefs, citations and other written materials define and organize the method of finding the truth, the oral tradition has lost much of its resonance—but not all of it. Testimony is expected to be given orally, on the assumption that the spoken, not the written, word is a truer reflection of the state of mind of a witness. Indeed, in many courtrooms jurors are not permitted to take notes, nor are they given written copies of the judge’s explanation of the law. Jurors are expected to hear the truth, or its opposite, not to read it. Thus, we may say that there is a clash of resonances in our concept of legal truth. On the one hand, there is a residual belief in the power of speech, and speech alone, to carry the truth; on the other hand, there is a much stronger belief in the authenticity of writing and, in particular, printing. This second belief has little tolerance for poetry, proverbs, sayings, parables or any other expressions of oral wisdom. The law is what legislators and judges have written. In our culture, lawyers do not have to be wise; they need to be well briefed.
Neil Postman in Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public discourse in the age of show business, (New York: Penguin Books, 2006), p. 19. First published (New York: Penguin Books, 1985).

Google Book Viewer


"Judges, lawyers and defendants do not regard proverbs or sayings as a relevant response to legal disputes."